Natural vs Synthetic Food Thickeners Which One is Better

Natural vs Synthetic Food Thickeners: Which One is Better

November 25, 2025 | By Dextrodelight | Food Thickeners

Functionality and transparency have become the vital criteria in the Australian food Industry. In the scenario where consumers are asking for healthier and cleaner ingredient lists with smoother textures, the food partners are reconsidering the use of thickening agents in their product formulations. 

When it comes to sauces, soups, desserts, dressings, plant-based alternatives, or beverages, the use of the right thickener will have an impact on characteristics like texture, stability, mouthfeel, shelf-life, cost, and consumer perception. 

There is an increasing interest in both natural and lab-created alternatives. But the question that each one asks is: Which is better? Natural or synthetic food thickeners?

This blog discusses the differences, performance capabilities, costs, clean-label influence, and industry applications. It will help you make informed decisions when dealing with food thickeners suppliers Australia-wide. 

Understanding Food Thickeners

Food thickeners are used in the food industry as functional additives to enhance the viscosity, texture, and stability of formulations. They do not affect the other properties, such as taste, and the nutritional value remains the same. These food thickeners are used in the production of dairy, confectionery, beverages, gluten-free foods, and ready-to-eat meals.

Food thickeners are classified into two main categories:

Natural Thickeners – They are obtained from plants, animals, or microorganisms and are usually processed very minimally.

Synthetic or Chemically Modified Thickeners – These food thickeners have been obtained or altered through chemical processes under strict control to improve their functionality, reliability, and durability.

Natural Food Thickeners

Common natural thickeners include:

Thickener

Source

Xanthan Gum

Fermented corn sugar

Guar Gum

Guar beans

Agar Agar

Seaweed

Pectin

Citrus fruits and apples

Carrageenan

Red seaweed

Gelatin

Collagen from animals

Strengths:

  1. They are well-known and clean-label friendly
  2. Functionality often comes in different forms in the same product: gelling, stabilising, and thickening
  3. Vegan/organic/plant-based markets have been good (for example, agar, pectin, and guar gum) 

Limitations:

  • Variability in batches depends on the different quality of the crop and weather conditions 
  • Not that effective as larger amounts are needed in certain systems 
  • Changes in pH, heat and freeze-thaw cycles impact performance 
  • In some cases (e.g. agar, pectin), the cost is higher.

Synthetic and Modified Food Thickeners

The Synthetic food thickeners are processed to boost the viscosity, stability, and overall performance.

Common examples include:

Thickener

Origin

Modified starch (E1404, E1420)

Plant-based starch chemically modified

Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)

Cellulose + acetic acid

Polysorbates

Lab-synthesised emulsifying thickeners

Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)

Processed plant cellulose

Strengths:

  1. High viscosity with low dosage
  2. Exceptional heat, pH and mechanical stability
  3. Good batch quality and uniformity
  4. Lower functional unit cost in bulk production

Limitations:

  • Ingredient names are less consumer-friendly
  • Might create disputes in clean-label or health-conscious markets
  • No nutritional gain

Performance Comparison in Food Systems

Application

Best Thickener Type

Reason

Ice cream

Blend (natural + modified)

Prevents ice crystal formation, smooth mouthfeel

Gluten-free bakery

Xanthan + guar

Improves structure, elasticity, and moisture retention

Soups and gravies

Modified starch

Consistency under high temperature and shear

Vegan desserts

Agar, carrageenan

Gelling, firmness, and clean-label acceptance

Beverages (plant-based milk)

CMC or pectin

Suspension, mouthfeel improvement

Solution: Formulators regularly mix natural and synthetic thickeners to strike a balance between the three aspects: cost, functionality, and label expectations.

Factors to Consider When Choosing

Before partnering with Food Thickeners Suppliers Australia, evaluate the following:

Criteria

Natural Thickeners

Synthetic Thickeners

Clean Label

High

Low

Cost Efficiency

Moderate

High

Stability in Heat/Shear

Moderate

Excellent

Allergen Risks

Soy, nut, animal

Low

Consumer Perception

Strong positive

Mixed

Shelf-life Performance

Moderate

Excellent

Final Verdict: Which One is Better?

There is not a single decisive answer.

Natural thickeners are the best in clean-label, organic, vegan, or health-focused applications.

Synthetic thickeners are the best in high-volume, heat-processed, cost-sensitive, and highly stable formulations.

A lot of manufacturers these days choose hybrid blends. They combine the stability of synthetic thickeners with the label appeal of natural ones.

Conclusion

Whether you choose natural thickeners or synthetic ones, your decision should depend on the product’s objectives, processing conditions, the consumers’ expectations and the budget. A strategic mixture may provide you with the best of two worlds – functioning and attracting the market.

If you’re searching for high-performance texturisers and thickener blends for your formulations, DextroDelight gives you the best guidance. We provide both natural and synthetic solutions along with technical support and formulations. 

Connect with the best food thickeners suppliers Australia and explore a variety of food thickeners on our website.